Edge Malaysia
Newsflash
Maybank, TNB lift KLCI at mid-day break
Maybank 1Q net profit up 17.87% to RM1.35b
50% of PPAs to be extended, says Che Khalib
CIMB's Nazir a man of change
Seagate Technology to acquire a controlling interest in Lacie SA
Maybank IB Research downgrades GAB to Hold, target price RM13.50
CIMB Research maintains Outperform on Perisai, target price RM1.50
Malaysian Bar supports call for independent law reform commission

Categories



Letter to the editor Please stop indiscriminate land conversion
Politics & Government 2009
Written by Ong Eu Soon   
Monday, 16 November 2009 22:29

SINCE the last (general) election, our political landscape has changed beyond recognition. Many have openly adopted partisan stand on issues affecting the people in their zealous quest to defend the Pakatan Rakyat (PR) state governments whenever there is a criticism.

The Penang state government under the leadership of Lim Guan Eng surprised a lot of those who voted for change by pursuing the policies and projects of (Tan Sri Dr) Koh Tsu Koon with a zeal beyond the imagination of Penangites.

Lim has willingly, without bribery or corruption, fast tracked all the projects he inherited from Koh's administration. When pressed on the Queensbay land conversion controversy, Lim blamed Koh for the decision.

Lim said he does not quite agree with the decision, but he has to comply. Lim continued to defend the decision of Koh.

The chief minister said state legal advisers informed him that the land was not bound by a crucial proviso in the National Land Code (NLC) 1965 which forbids foreshore land from being converted to freehold. He said the land had been gazetted as state land — and not considered foreshore — by the previous state administration.

In a press report, lawyer Agatha Foo pointed out a proviso in Section 76 of the NLC, which Lim had overlooked in his assembly reply. Foo noted that the proviso expressly prohibits the state from disposing of "any part of the foreshore or sea-bed for a period exceeding ninety-nine years".

The proviso had been inserted when Section 76 was amended in parliament in 1985. "Consequentially, the said proviso would also prohibit the state from re-alienating or converting any part of the reclaimed foreshore or sea-bed to freehold land."

"Any subsequent attempt by the state to re-alienate or convert any part of the foreshore or sea-bed to freehold, notwithstanding that the foreshore or sea-bed has now been reclaimed, would be tantamount to a circumvention of the prohibition in Section 76 and hence be ultra vires the NLC."

A lot of critics were puzzled by how the chief minister missed a crucial proviso in the NLC. The truth is now being revealed.

The chief minister has since wanted to convert a 1.4ha seafront site, adjacent to the 124-year-old Eastern and Oriental (E&O) Hotel in Lebuh Farquhar, from leasehold to freehold on his free will.

On Oct 15, 2008, Lim issued a press statement and promised not to follow in the footsteps of Koh in circumventing the NLC by converting all reclaimed land from leasehold to freehold status.

Now hardly a year has gone by, Lim has silently converted the PDC Heritage Hotel site from leasehold to freehold status. The PDC Heritage Hotel site is a 1.4ha seafront site adjacent to the E&O Hotel in Lebuh Farquhar. This site is not even a reclaimed land.

The conversion is clearly against the NLC proviso. Does Lim have something to hide from Penangites when he defended Koh's decision on the Queensbay land conversion controversy?

Did Lim learn anything from the Queensbay land conversion controversy? Lim has no excuse to pledge ignorance on the proviso. Why did Lim opt to flout the NLC proviso by converting the 1.4ha seafront site adjacent to the E&O Hotel from leasehold to freehold?

The PDC heritage project is within the heritage enclave which means it must comply with the height requirement of not taller than 18 metres. Without the conversion from leasehold to freehold, the project will not have sufficient commercial value to sustain.

Does Lim want to mislead us again that the prime seafront land which is a state land cannot be considered as a foreshore land?

I am calling all concerned Penangites to stand up and voice their concern over the conversion of reclamation land from leasehold to freehold. We want a state government that abides by the law and not to find any loophole to circumvent any proviso of the NLC when dealing with state land.

We need to initiate a movement to stop all illegal land conversion especially on reclaimed land and seafront land. I believe we need to put a full stop to these bad practices before they get out of control.

Ong Eu Soon
Nibong Tebal, Penang

  Last Updated on Monday, 16 November 2009 22:30

Other Publications & Pullouts